These Islands
  • Log In / Register
  • About Us
  • Contact

Menu
  • HOME
  • VALUES
  • FOCUS
  • ADVISORY COUNCIL
  • ABOUT US
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • BRIEFING ROOM
  • FUNDING

SCOTTISH POLITICS IN THE GRIP OF A FACT-DENIAL EPIDEMIC

03 May 2021

A survey commissioned by These Islands has revealed widespread fact denial within the Scottish electorate and deep confusion over the SNP’s independence plans, particularly with respect to currency. Survation surveyed 1,047 people aged 16+ living in Scotland. Fieldwork was conducted 21st - 23rd April 2021.


Fact Denial

  • 57% of Scottish independence supporters agree with the statement “The figures used to calculate Scotland’s deficit (the GERS figures) are made up by Westminster to hide Scotland's true wealth” and 90% of those considered the statement to be “important” or “very important” to their opinion on Scottish independence.

The reality of Scotland’s deficit position is shown in the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures published by the Scottish Government. These figures qualify as National Statistics and are compiled by the Scottish Government’s own statisticians and economists. It should be deeply shocking that most independence supporters agree with the statement above – the figures are demonstrably not “made up by Westminster” and it is fantastical to believe that an SNP Government would choose to publish figures which “hide Scotland’s true wealth”. The First Minister is a gifted communicator, but is strangely reluctant to nail this corrosive myth.

The survey also found that most independence supporters agreed with other demonstrably false statements relating to official Scottish Government figures (myths which are widely shared on social media):

  • 54% of independence supporters agree “Scottish tax revenues are understated because of Scottish exports leaving via English ports”1No tax revenues are raised directly from exports (there are no export duties in the UK) and the allocation of the economic activity that supports those exports has nothing to do with the port of export from the UK. Furthermore, although these figures have no bearing on Scottish taxes reported in GERS, even when export statistics are published by the Scottish government they are allocated based on destination, not on port of departure: “The ESS publication measures the destination of goods exported from Scotland regardless of the port from which they leave the UK.” https://www.gov.scot/publications/about-export-statistics-Scotland/pages/export-statistics-scotland-faqs/
  • 66% of independence supporters agree “Scottish tax revenues are understated because taxes generated by the whisky industry are not properly allocated to Scotland”2As per footnote (1), there are no export duties on Whisky. Whisky duty is a consumption tax and so is correctly allocated in GERS based on consumption data – Scotland should not be allocated consumption duty paid by consumers in England any more than it should be allocated consumption duty paid by drinkers in France. In the same way consumption duty on French wine consumed in Scotland is allocated to Scotland, not France.
  • 55% of independence supporters agree “Scotland is only seen to be running a deficit because some costs outside of Scotland, like HS2 and infrastructure spending in the South East, are charged to Scotland”3HS2 is the only infrastructure spending outside Scotland that is allocated to Scotland in GERS – no other “infrastructure spending in the South East” is allocated to Scotland. In 2018-19, £72m of HS2 costs were allocated to Scotland in GERS compared to a total deficit of £13,155m.

/image/36BE1C06-0117-4871-859A-7D0DC4D7FFBC.png

This denial of the Scottish Government’s economic data and belief in myths about how the figures are compiled is consistent with the survey’s finding of widespread misunderstanding about Scotland’s balance of tax and spending:

  • Only 20% of supporters of independence are aware that total public spending in Scotland is more than the amount raised in taxes4In the pre-pandemic year of 2018/19, These Islands analysis of GERS figures shows that - ignoring all international spending, defence and central government spending outside Scotland and Scotland’s share of the UK’s debt servicing costs – spending in Scotland exceeded taxes raised by an estimated £5.7 billion. This analysis has been shared with the Scottish Government economists and statisticians who are responsible for compiling GERS who were able to confirm that we have correctly interpreted the detailed data they provide on spending for Scotland.  - 38% wrongly believe it is less.

This means 80% of independence supporters are unaware that public spending in Scotland is more than the amount raised in taxes in Scotland.

Commenting on the survey results, Chairman of These Islands Kevin Hague said:

This survey reveals for the first time the true scale of what amounts to a fact-denial epidemic in Scotland. We have been tracking the spread of economic disinformation in the Scottish independence debate for some time now, but we are still shocked by these findings. A desire to see a well-informed electorate should not be a partisan issue; this survey should worry anybody who believes that sound democratic processes require a well-informed electorate.
 
The debate about Scotland’s future in the UK is obviously about a lot more than economics, but it is clear from this survey that many supporters of independence deny (or have been persuaded to deny) simple economic facts – that cannot be healthy for democracy.


Policy Confusion

The survey also shows that, despite years of debate, the Scottish electorate remains deeply confused over the SNP’s currency policy (and supporters of independence appear as confused as the electorate in general):

/image/1B9B5D60-A157-4271-9B54-245B0BC5FC9D.jpeg

The official SNP line is the third of those listed above (keep the pound until a new Scottish currency is adopted), a policy only 17% of the electorate are aware of. The confusion is understandable: it has suited the SNP to be opaque on currency and the motivation for this obfuscation is obvious when you look at the survey's findings on the relative popularity of the various options:

/image/79101D64-1B54-4D96-AC6B-D144FACB27F4.jpeg

The only option which finds favour with the electorate is “keep the pound indefinitely”, which is inconsistent with Scotland becoming independent.

If the SNP accepts that joining the EU means committing to joining the euro, that outcome is the option least popular with voters, with only 25% in favour.5Given the need for an independent Scotland to have created a central bank and to have control of its own currency (which can be converged with the euro prior to joining), the second option in both the exhibits above is actually impossible - an independent Scotland could not adopt the euro directly from sterling

Commenting further on the survey results, Chairman of These Islands Kevin Hague said:

This survey shows that Scottish voters simply do not know what the SNP’s currency plans are. The problem the SNP face is that, while it is clear most Scots want to keep the pound, their short-term strategy of sterlingisation would be unsustainable and incompatible with their stated desire for an independent Scotland to join the EU. Joining the EU means committing to join the euro - an unpopular option.
 
The confusion over currency plans and evidence of widespread fact-denial revealed by this survey show that current support for independence is built on misunderstanding and misinformation.

 

Comments

John Connelly 03/05/2021 07:54:06

Excellent report by these island

Jonathan Callaway 03/05/2021 11:00:18

A very good but worrying summary. What is critical is for objective non-aligned academic and business representatives to come together and put together fact sheets outlining the economic and fiscal implications of independence. It is clear that none of the political parties will be believed by the majority of the population, whatever they say, because bias and mis-information will be assumed and thus their message discounted. People will believe what they want to believe. If the Scottish people are to be asked to vote again in a second referendum it is therefore so important that the unvarnished facts, whether positive or negative for either side's case, are made readily and widely available from a credible source. If the Yes side lose 49/51 the debate will continue but it they win 51/49 there will be no going back - an exact replica of the Brexit story. Neither Scotland nor the UK as a whole should put itself through that again.

Michael Ashmore 03/05/2021 12:19:51

A good report, but many people already know that Independence supporters are not interested in the facts. Nicola herself has admitted that the SNP have not done any work on the currency issue or the prospect of a border with England. Going into an Election, which may eventually lead to a second referendum, without these policies is a disgrace by the independence supporting parties, but we know why - they don't have the answers. They didn't in 2014 and don't now. Mike Ashmore

Alan Keegan 03/05/2021 12:35:20

Terrific diligent work. I think we have to stop treating the SNP as "normal" political party. It's an identity politics campaign group. Facts don't matter to them, neither does performance, competence or to a lesser degree integrity. I'm hopeful that Mr Gove etc in the UK recognise this and are working on plans to discredit the SNP's time in office, remove powers that have been corrupted, replace fake quangos with UK versions, cut propaganda spend, get the media away from direct SNP control etc.

JayGeeCee 03/05/2021 15:05:18

All the more reason for a prior negotiation of the Independence Agreement with the UK so there is a clear understanding of what the vote is for. Furthermore, in line with the SNP's view on Brexit, those regions of Scotland that have no majority for independence should not be forced to leave. I look forward to the Scottish border moving to the Antonine Wall and down to the Trossachs.

Apolo Kaggwa 03/05/2021 17:50:57

FACTS are stubborn, aren't they? The "GERS figures" are credible simply because they are published by the Scottish government and not Westminster. Wanting to be independent for the sake of it, without taking into consideration the consequences ( COST ) is very bad and dangerous for Scotland's future. The people of Scotland can only make up their mind about their future if they know the FACTS. I have not heard anything from the SNP to date that states what the FACTS are and so the Scottish electorate are still in the dark. Well done These Islands.

Andrew Hamilton 03/05/2021 19:49:15

The level of ignorance which this report exposes is quite terrifying. If the SNP win an outright majority in Thursday's election , Boris should consider Professor Naill Fergusson's advice. Which is to introduce Canadian type legislation ( see Canada's Clarity Act of March 2000) binding Scotland to clarity in both the question on the ballot paper and the margin of votes cast in favour of separation; for example not 50+1 but say 55%. This would arguably be better than continuing to say No to the SNP's request for a second Independence referendum and a sensible counterweight to the SNP's control of the Scottish media and their ruthless spin machine.

neil Foss 03/05/2021 20:01:24

It’s no surprise the Scottish don’t know what they’re voting for. The SNP have only one policy and no ideas. To leave the UK to join the EU would be a self inflicted disaster and I wish I could vote for it.

John Sargeant 05/05/2021 16:23:14

These are all very telling statistics. The challenge is to make them more widely known without creating a backlash that they are somehow part of a "Project Fear" campaign. It is sad that pro-independence voters will no doubt make just such a response, which was so effective for the pro-Brexit camp in 2016. We can also expect that arguments which play to Scots' patriotic feelings will be foremost in any future campaign because they are likely to outweigh financial ones. That is, unless there is a team to put forward the key arguments more effectively than the leaders of Remain managed over Europe.

Andrew Northway 08/05/2021 11:31:06

Imagine actually claiming Scotland isnt wealthy enough to be a successful independent country. It is exactly this ignorant, colonial attitude which has seen support for independence rise and rise and rise to the point where it is now on a knife edge. Trying actually making a positive case for the Union and you might get some joy.

Michael 31/05/2021 15:34:56

I remember during the independence debate one school girl asked the simple question about Scotland paying less than it gets back. Sturgeon categorically stated this was not true citing figures from the one year in ages that suited her agenda. At best this is economical with the truth at worse it is downright lying. As for exports, which country charges when exports leave as I thought duties are only collected on imports? Does this not mean the exports question is irrelevant as no tax revenue is generated? Only corporation tax on the companies resulting profit.

Add Your Comment

Please log in to create your comment

LOG IN

SHARE:

Related downloads

  • These Islands_Data Tables

    652 Kb, xlsx
    DOWNLOAD
info@these-islands.co.uk
10 Wemyss Place
Edinburgh
EH3 6DL

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • instagram